Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Penalty upheld for late self-assessment tax payment despite revised return filing.</h1> <h3>Claris Life Sciences Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD), Range 1, Ahmedabad</h3> The Special Bench held that the assessee is liable to penalty under Section 221(1) for non-payment of self-assessment tax at the time of filing the ... Penalty u/s 221(1) - non-payment of self-assessment tax under section 140A at the time of filing an income tax return which has been revised subsequently - Held that:- The assessee is, in principle, covered by the scope of the penalty under section 221(1) of the Act in a case in which the though the assessee has not paid the admitted tax liability under section 140A, while filing the original return of income, the assessee subsequently pays the tax on the revised return of income, at the time of filing the revised return of income. We, therefore, answer the question referred to the special bench in affirmative and against the assessee. However, whether the penalty under section 221(1) r.w.s. 140A(1) is actually leviable on the facts of a particular case or not will depend on the facts of that case and depending on, inter alia, the factual finding as to whether or not the default of the assessee was for good and sufficient reasons- something with which we are not really concerned at this stage due to inherently limited scope of the question before the special bench. The matter shall now go back to the division bench for giving effect to our above observations and for deciding the matter afresh in the light of, inter alia, the above stated legal position. Pronounced in the open court today on the 26th day of September 2017. Issues Involved:1. Whether an assessee is liable to penalty under section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-payment of self-assessment tax under section 140A at the time of filing the original income tax return, even if the tax is paid while filing a revised return of income.Detailed Analysis:Background:The issue arose from conflicting decisions by different benches regarding the applicability of Section 221(1) for non-payment of self-assessment tax under Section 140A when the original return is subsequently revised and the tax is paid. The assessee, a public company, filed its original return on 30th September 2008, declaring a taxable income of Rs. 44,69,33,790 and claimed to have paid self-assessment tax, which was later found to be incorrect. The company revised its return on 21st May 2009, declaring a lower income and paid the self-assessment tax at that time. The Assessing Officer imposed a penalty of Rs. 50,00,000 for non-payment of self-assessment tax at the time of filing the original return, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The matter was referred to a Special Bench due to conflicting decisions.Preliminary Issue:The Special Bench had to decide whether to address only the specific question referred to it or to consider the entire appeal. It was decided to limit the scope to the specific question of whether penalty under Section 221(1) can be imposed for non-payment of self-assessment tax at the time of filing the original return, even if the tax is paid while filing a revised return.Submissions by the Assessee:The assessee argued that the revised return, which was filed within the permissible limit and was bonafide, replaces the original return. Therefore, the penalty for non-payment of self-assessment tax at the time of the original return should not be imposed. The assessee cited several judicial precedents to support the view that a revised return substitutes the original return for all purposes, including the assessment of income and related claims. The assessee also argued that the penalty under Section 221(1) is for an event-specific lapse and not a time-specific lapse, and since the tax was paid at the time of filing the revised return, the penalty should not be imposed.Stand of the Revenue:The Revenue opposed the assessee's submissions, arguing that the default in payment of self-assessment tax at the time of the original return is not rectified by the subsequent filing of a revised return and payment of tax. The Revenue emphasized that the penalty is for the lapse at the time of filing the original return, and subsequent actions do not exonerate the assessee from the penalty. The Revenue cited judicial precedents to support the view that penalty under Section 221(1) is leviable even if the tax is subsequently paid before the initiation of penalty proceedings.Rejoinder by the Assessee:The assessee reiterated that the penalty is for non-payment of admitted tax liability at the time of filing the return and that the revised return, which replaces the original return, should be considered for this purpose. The assessee distinguished the judicial precedents cited by the Revenue, arguing that they were not applicable to the specific context of penalty under Section 221(1) for non-payment of self-assessment tax.Analysis:The Special Bench analyzed the statutory provisions of Sections 140A(1) and 221(1) and concluded that the default triggering the penal liability under Section 221(1) is the default in making payment of tax at the time of filing the original return. The filing of a revised return does not obliterate the default committed at the time of the original return. The judicial precedents cited by the assessee were found to be relevant to the assessment of income and related claims but not to the penal consequences for the default in payment of self-assessment tax. The Bench emphasized that the subsequent payment of tax does not affect the penal consequences under Section 221(1).Conclusion:The Special Bench concluded that the assessee is liable to penalty under Section 221(1) for non-payment of self-assessment tax at the time of filing the original return, even if the tax is paid while filing the revised return. The matter was remanded to the division bench for further proceedings based on this legal position.Final Judgment:The Special Bench answered the question in the affirmative and against the assessee, holding that the penalty under Section 221(1) is applicable for non-payment of self-assessment tax at the time of filing the original return, irrespective of the subsequent payment at the time of filing the revised return. The case was sent back to the division bench for further proceedings.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found