Regular bail in Companies Act prosecution granted after prima facie satisfaction of statutory twin conditions and distinct role assessment.

Regular bail under the Companies Act prosecution was granted after the Court applied the statutory twin conditions in Section 212(6) on a prima facie basis. The petitioner's role as stock auditor for a later period was found materially distinct from the core allegations, the prosecution material showed adverse audit observations but did not displace the Court's view that there were reasonable grounds to believe he was not guilty, and similarly placed co-accused had already obtained bail. The Court also noted that the petitioner had remained at liberty for a substantial period and was not likely to commit an offence while on bail, so the bail request was allowed and the interim application became infructuous.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to regular bail in a prosecution for offences under the Companies Act, 2013, having regard to the statutory restrictions on bail under Section 212(6) and the surrounding circumstances.

Analysis: The petitioner was appointed as a stock auditor for the later period of 2016-17, while the alleged fraud pertained to an earlier period. The audit report relied upon by the prosecution was also noted to contain adverse observations, including the classification of the account as a non-performing asset and irregularities in the stock position. The Court further noted that similarly placed co-accused had already been granted bail and that the petitioner had remained at liberty for a substantial period after summoning. In the Court's view, the Public Prosecutor had been afforded an opportunity to oppose bail, and on a prima facie assessment there were reasonable grounds to believe that the petitioner was not guilty and was not likely to commit an offence while on bail.

Conclusion: The petitioner satisfied the requirements for bail and was held entitled to be enlarged on regular bail.

Final Conclusion: Regular bail was granted in a prosecution arising out of alleged fraudulent conduct connected with stock audit and drawing power figures, and the connected interim bail request became infructuous.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory twin conditions governing bail are found to be satisfied on a prima facie assessment, and the accused's role is materially distinct from the core allegations, regular bail may be granted even in an economic offence prosecution.

---