Builder ordered to refund Rs.2.86 crore profiteered amount to flat buyers under Section 171 CGST Act

NAPA found respondent builder contravened Section 171 of CGST Act by not passing input tax credit benefits to flat buyers. Respondent profiteered Rs.2,86,32,474 during July 2017-March 2019, though Rs.1,88,56,367 was already passed to 772 buyers. Authority ordered respondent to refund specific amounts to individual applicants ranging from Rs.27,510 to Rs.71,868 plus Rs.2,80,46,934 to other buyers with 18% interest within three months. Commissioners directed to monitor compliance under DGAP supervision.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the Respondent had passed on the benefit of input tax credit (ITC) to the buyers.
2. Methodology for calculating the benefit of ITC.
3. Legality and constitutionality of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
4. Whether the Respondent was entitled to VAT credit for the pre-GST period.
5. Compliance with the Anti-Profiteering provisions under the CGST Act, 2017.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the Respondent had passed on the benefit of input tax credit (ITC) to the buyers:
The DGAP found that the Respondent had benefited from additional ITC post-GST implementation, which was not passed on to the buyers. The ITC as a percentage of turnover during the pre-GST period was 0%, while it was 6.55% during the post-GST period. The Respondent had not reduced the basic prices of the flats by 6.55% due to the additional ITC benefit and had charged GST on pre-GST basic prices, contravening Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The DGAP calculated that the Respondent needed to pass on Rs. 4,74,88,840/- but had only passed on Rs. 1,88,56,367/- to 772 homebuyers, leaving a balance of Rs. 2,86,32,474/- to be passed on.

2. Methodology for calculating the benefit of ITC:
The methodology for calculating the benefit of ITC was based on comparing the ratios of ITC to turnover in the pre-GST and post-GST periods. The DGAP's methodology was deemed appropriate, logical, and reasonable. The Respondent's contention that the methodology should consider the increased tax rates on inputs post-GST was rejected. The DGAP's approach of calculating the benefit based on the additional ITC available post-GST was upheld.

3. Legality and constitutionality of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017:
The Respondent challenged the constitutionality of Section 171, arguing it was ultra vires of Article 246A and Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The Authority held that Section 171 aimed to ensure that benefits of tax reduction and ITC were passed on to consumers, which was in the public interest and did not violate the Constitution. The Authority also rejected the contention that the composition of the Authority was unconstitutional, stating that it was constituted under Section 171(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, and did not require a judicial member.

4. Whether the Respondent was entitled to VAT credit for the pre-GST period:
The Respondent claimed VAT credit for the pre-GST period, which was rejected. The DGAP found that the Respondent had opted for the composition scheme of 1% VAT and had not availed any VAT input credit. The Respondent's contention was found to be incorrect and not acceptable.

5. Compliance with the Anti-Profiteering provisions under the CGST Act, 2017:
The Authority concluded that the Respondent had contravened Section 171(1) by not passing on the additional ITC benefit to the buyers. The Respondent was directed to pass on the remaining amount of Rs. 2,86,32,474/- to the buyers along with interest. The Commissioners of CGST/SGST Gurugram, Haryana, were directed to monitor compliance with this order.

Conclusion:
The Respondent was found to have contravened Section 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017, by not passing on the benefit of ITC to the buyers. The methodology adopted by the DGAP for calculating the benefit of ITC was upheld, and the Respondent's contentions regarding the constitutionality of Section 171 and entitlement to VAT credit were rejected. The Respondent was directed to pass on the remaining benefit to the buyers along with interest.

---