Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a bona fide financial debt existed so as to sustain initiation of CIRP under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The application was founded on alleged inter-corporate deposits supported by loan agreements and bank entries, but the record revealed serious inconsistencies in the alleged disbursements, repayments, and the manner in which the transactions were reflected across the pleadings and annexures. The assessment order under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the forensic audit report were not treated as conclusive against the financial creditors, but they were relied upon as corroborative material showing common directors, common registered office, immediate round-tripping of funds, and other features indicating that the transactions were not ordinary lender-borrower arrangements. The Court applied the principle that a transaction which is sham or collusive does not constitute financial debt for the purposes of the Code and found that the surrounding facts did not establish a genuine debt owed in the ordinary course of borrowing against time value of money.
Conclusion: No bona fide financial debt was proved and the petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was not maintainable.