Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        1988 (7) TMI 70 - HC - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court upholds Tax Laws in J&K, directs duty payment. The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of the Taxation Laws (Application to Jammu & Kashmir) Act, 1954, and the Central ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court upholds Tax Laws in J&K, directs duty payment.

                            The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of the Taxation Laws (Application to Jammu & Kashmir) Act, 1954, and the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, in the State of Jammu & Kashmir. It upheld the extension of these laws to the State, citing constitutional provisions and previous judgments. The court directed the petitioner to pay the excise duty collected from consumers and allowed encashment of bank guarantees. It emphasized the petitioner's obligation as an agent of the government and highlighted the importance of public revenue for development.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Validity of the application of the Taxation Laws (Application to Jammu & Kashmir) Act, 1954.
                            2. Validity of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, in the State of Jammu & Kashmir.
                            3. The competence of the Union Parliament to legislate and extend laws to the State of Jammu & Kashmir.
                            4. The petitioner's obligation to pay excise duty collected from consumers.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Validity of the application of the Taxation Laws (Application to Jammu & Kashmir) Act, 1954:
                            The petitioner challenged the validity of the Taxation Laws (Application to Jammu & Kashmir) Act, 1954, arguing that it violated the Instrument of Accession and could not be applied to the State. The court rejected this argument, stating that the Instrument of Accession allowed for the extension of legislative powers and that the Constitution (Application to Jammu & Kashmir) Order, 1954, was validly issued by the President of India under Article 370. The court cited previous judgments, including the Supreme Court's decisions, to support the constitutionality and validity of Article 370 and the Taxation Laws Act of 1954.

                            2. Validity of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, in the State of Jammu & Kashmir:
                            The petitioner contended that the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, was a "dead law" for Jammu & Kashmir and could not be extended to the State. The court refuted this, stating that the Act was validly extended through the Taxation Laws Act of 1954. The court emphasized that the legislative competence of the Union Parliament, under Article 246 and the Constitution Order of 1954, included the power to legislate on excise duties. The court also noted that the State's own Tobacco Excise Duty Ordinance ceased to be valid once the Union Parliament legislated in the same field.

                            3. The competence of the Union Parliament to legislate and extend laws to the State of Jammu & Kashmir:
                            The petitioner argued that the Union Parliament could not extend existing laws to Jammu & Kashmir but could only enact new laws. The court dismissed this argument, clarifying that the power to "make laws" included the power to "extend laws." The court held that the extension of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, to Jammu & Kashmir was constitutionally valid and that the Parliament's legislative competence over the State was well established under Article 370 and the Constitution Order of 1954.

                            4. The petitioner's obligation to pay excise duty collected from consumers:
                            The court addressed the petitioner's obligation to pay the excise duty collected from consumers. It emphasized that the petitioner, having collected the excise duty as an agent of the government, could not retain the amount and must pay it to the department. The court underscored the principle of equity, stating that the petitioner could not enrich itself by withholding the excise duty collected on behalf of the government.

                            Conclusion:
                            The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the validity and applicability of the Taxation Laws (Application to Jammu & Kashmir) Act, 1954, and the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, to the State of Jammu & Kashmir. It directed the petitioner to pay the excise duty collected from consumers and allowed the encashment of bank guarantees furnished by the petitioner. The court also expressed concern over the delay caused by the petitioner's conduct and emphasized the importance of public revenue for developmental works.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found