Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revised show cause notice proposing tax and penalty under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act was liable to be set aside for being pre-determined and for requiring a fresh notice and consideration of objections.
Analysis: The notice had already recorded a conclusion on the levy of tax and penalty and treated the assessee's objections on control and possession as immaterial, showing that the authority had made up its mind before considering the explanation. In such circumstances, the notice could not be sustained, and the assessee was entitled to a fresh notice and a fair opportunity to place objections and documentary evidence before the authority. The appellate court therefore interfered with the order that had merely directed the assessee to respond to the defective notice.
Conclusion: The impugned revised notice was set aside and the matter was remitted for issuance of a fresh notice and fresh adjudication after hearing the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A show cause notice that discloses a concluded decision on tax and penalty, instead of keeping the issue open for consideration of objections, is vitiated by pre-judgment and cannot be sustained.