Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to have its claim for reimbursement under section 15(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 considered and decided on merits by the tax authorities notwithstanding the omission of that provision later.
Analysis: The assessment order itself recorded that refund or reimbursement of local tax paid on intra-State purchase of declared goods was admissible subject to payment of CST on the inter-State sale of such goods. Section 50 of the Assam Value Added Tax Act, 2003 contemplates refund on a claim being made where tax has been paid in excess, and section 15(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 required reimbursement in the manner and subject to the conditions provided by the State law. Since no specific manner was shown to exist under the State law, the claim was permitted to be placed before the authorities for a decision on merits. The later omission of section 15(b) did not affect claims relating to an assessment year when that provision was in force.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to make an application, and the authorities were directed to decide the claim for reimbursement by a reasoned order on merits within the stipulated time.
Ratio Decidendi: A claim for reimbursement under section 15(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 must be examined on its merits for the assessment year in which the provision operated, and the later omission of the provision does not extinguish such claim.