Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether raw petroleum coke and calcined petroleum coke were covered by the same entry as "coke in all its forms" for the purpose of refund of tax under the sales tax law.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the character of raw petroleum coke after calcination and whether the process created a commercially different commodity so as to justify denial of refund. The Court held that the governing principle was the interpretation of the statutory entry in the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which treats coke in all its forms as one composite entry. Applying the earlier Supreme Court ruling on the scope of that entry, the Court found that the fact of chemical or physical change did not take calcined petroleum coke out of the inclusive expression used in the statute. The reasoning that raw petroleum coke and calcined petroleum coke were separate commercial commodities was therefore not accepted as a basis to refuse relief.
Conclusion: The refund rejection could not stand on the ground that calcined petroleum coke was outside the relevant statutory entry; the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with the binding interpretation.