Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (5) TMI 1416 - NAPA - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cinema operator violated section 171 CGST Act by not passing GST rate reduction benefit to customers NAPA found respondent cinema operator violated section 171 of CGST Act by not passing GST rate reduction benefit to customers. When GST on movie tickets ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Cinema operator violated section 171 CGST Act by not passing GST rate reduction benefit to customers

                            NAPA found respondent cinema operator violated section 171 of CGST Act by not passing GST rate reduction benefit to customers. When GST on movie tickets (100 or less) reduced from 18% to 12% effective 01.01.2019, respondent maintained same selling prices while increasing base prices, resulting in profiteering of 1,31,754. NAPA directed respondent to reduce ticket prices commensurately and deposit profiteered amount with 18% interest in equal parts to Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds. No penalty imposed as specific penalty provisions under section 171(3A) came into force only from 01.01.2020, making retrospective application impermissible.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Allegation of profiteering by the Respondent.
                            2. Investigation process by the DGAP.
                            3. Determination of profiteering and quantification.
                            4. Compliance with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
                            5. Directions for depositing the profiteered amount.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Allegation of Profiteering by the Respondent:
                            The primary issue was the allegation that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of the GST rate reduction from 18% to 12% on "Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films where the price of admission ticket was one hundred rupees or less" effective from 01.01.2019. Instead, the Respondent increased the base prices of the tickets to maintain the same cum-tax selling prices as in the pre-rate reduction period.

                            2. Investigation Process by the DGAP:
                            The DGAP conducted a detailed investigation under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017, based on an application filed by Applicant No. 1. The investigation covered the period from 01.01.2019 to 30.09.2019. Despite multiple notices and summons, the Respondent did not submit the requisite records/documents. The jurisdictional GST office provided month-wise details of outward taxable supplies, category-wise price lists, sample tickets, and GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns.

                            3. Determination of Profiteering and Quantification:
                            The DGAP observed that the Respondent maintained the same cum-tax prices for all categories of tickets (Balcony- Rs. 70, 1st Class- Rs. 50 & Third Class- Rs. 10) after the GST rate reduction, resulting in profiteering. The methodology adopted to compute profiteering was in 'lump sum' due to the Respondent not maintaining class/category-wise details. The total profiteering amount was determined to be Rs. 1,31,754/- for the period from January 2019 to September 2019.

                            4. Compliance with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017:
                            Section 171 mandates that any reduction in the rate of tax on any supply of goods or services should be passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. The Respondent's failure to reduce the base prices of the tickets despite the GST rate reduction was a clear contravention of this provision. The Respondent's argument that there was no variation in his price list before and after the GST rate reduction was not accepted as it was an admission of the charges framed.

                            5. Directions for Depositing the Profiteered Amount:
                            The Authority directed the Respondent to deposit the profiteered amount of Rs. 1,31,754/- along with interest at 18% from the date of collection till the date of deposit. The amount was to be deposited in two equal parts in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund (CWF) and the Telangana State CWF within three months from the date of receipt of the Order. The Commissioners of CGST/SGST Telangana were directed to monitor the compliance of this Order under the supervision of the DGAP.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Respondent was found to have contravened Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, by not passing on the benefit of the GST rate reduction to the recipients. The total profiteering amount of Rs. 1,31,754/- was determined, and the Respondent was directed to deposit this amount along with interest in the respective Consumer Welfare Funds. The Order was passed within the limitation period prescribed under Rule 133(1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, considering the exclusion of the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 due to the COVID-19 pandemic as per the Hon'ble Supreme Court's directions.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found