Tribunal allows appeal on late deposit issue, dismisses education cess claim. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance by the CPC on the late deposit of employees' contribution to ESI ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal allows appeal on late deposit issue, dismisses education cess claim.
The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance by the CPC on the late deposit of employees' contribution to ESI & PF for the assessment year 2019-20. It emphasized the prospective application of the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, and dismissed the claim for education cess as an allowable expenditure since the assessee did not press this ground during the hearing.
Issues: 1. Disallowance of late deposit of employees' contribution to ESI & PF. 2. Applicability of the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021. 3. Claiming education cess as an allowable expenditure.
Issue 1: Disallowance of late deposit of employees' contribution to ESI & PF
The appeal was filed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the disallowance of Rs. 3,41,858 towards late deposit of employees' contribution to ESI & PF for the assessment year 2019-20. The assessee argued that the contribution was deposited before the due date of filing the return of income u/s. 139 of the Act, relying on judicial precedents. The Department, however, supported the disallowance based on the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021. The Tribunal noted the divergent views of different High Courts but emphasized following the decisions of the jurisdictional Punjab & Haryana High Court. The Tribunal held that the amendment was applicable prospectively from assessment year 2021-22 onwards and thus directed the deletion of the disallowance made by the CPC.
Issue 2: Applicability of the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021
The amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, added an explanation to sections 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act. The Department argued that the amendment clarified that employees' contribution should be allowed as a deduction only if paid within the prescribed due dates, supporting the retrospective application of the amendment. However, the Tribunal, considering various High Court decisions and Tribunal Benches, held that the amendment applied prospectively from assessment year 2021-22 onwards. As the impugned assessment year was 2019-20, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance.
Issue 3: Claiming education cess as an allowable expenditure
The assessee sought to claim education cess as an allowable expenditure, but during the hearing, the assessee decided not to press this ground of appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed this ground as not pressed. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed based on the decisions regarding the disallowance of late deposit of employees' contribution to ESI & PF.
In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the deletion of the disallowance made by the CPC on the late deposit of employees' contribution to ESI & PF for the assessment year 2019-20. The Tribunal emphasized the prospective application of the amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, and dismissed the claim regarding education cess as an allowable expenditure as not pressed by the assessee during the hearing.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.