Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether employees' contribution to provident fund, paid before the due date for filing the return, could be added in processing the return under section 143(1), and whether such disallowance was sustainable on merits.
Analysis: The return was processed without scrutiny assessment, and the addition was made only through an intimation under section 143(1). The issue whether employees' contribution to provident fund, paid before the return-filing due date, is allowable had already been treated by the Tribunal as a debatable one not fit for adjustment in summary processing. On merits also, the Tribunal followed its earlier view that there is no distinction, for deduction purposes in this context, between employees' and employer's contribution when payment is made before the due date under section 139(1), and that the contrary view would not justify the impugned adjustment.
Conclusion: The addition made in processing under section 143(1) was unsustainable and was deleted. The assessee's claim succeeded.