Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the operational creditor established an unpaid operational debt and default so as to maintain an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The payment records and bank transactions showed that amounts received from the corporate debtor exceeded the principal invoices relied upon, and the operational creditor's adjustment of payments was inconsistent with the documentary record. The claim also varied across invoices and e-mail correspondence, and the alleged outstanding balance was not satisfactorily reconciled with the bank account statement and invoice-wise adjustments.
Conclusion: The existence of a due and payable operational debt was not established, and the application under Section 9 was not maintainable.
Final Conclusion: The insolvency petition failed for want of proof of outstanding operational debt and default, and the proceedings were brought to an end by dismissal.
Ratio Decidendi: An application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot succeed unless the operational creditor proves, on the basis of consistent and reliable records, that an unpaid operational debt and default actually subsist.