Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order reversing input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was liable to be set aside for non-consideration of the assessee's reply and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The petitioner had earlier replied to the show cause notice and had also sought time in response to the later notice. The impugned order proceeded on the footing that no reply had been received, but it did not indicate whether the earlier reply had been considered. Since the existence and consideration of the reply was a material aspect going to the fairness of the assessment, the order required interference and a fresh decision after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the respondent for reconsideration after affording the petitioner an opportunity to place his defence.