Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the attachment of the petitioner's bank account could continue after the first appellate orders had been set aside, the appeals had been remanded for fresh hearing, and recovery proceedings were stayed.
Analysis: The attachment was examined in the context of the statutory scheme governing provisional attachment, special mode of recovery, and recovery as arrears of land revenue. Since the assessment process had already culminated and the Tribunal had directed that recovery proceedings remain stayed until disposal of the first appeals, there was no subsisting proceeding on the basis of which the attachment could validly be maintained. The statutory provisions invoked for attachment and recovery were therefore held inapplicable to the facts then prevailing.
Conclusion: The attachment could not survive and was liable to be quashed, with the petitioner succeeding on this issue.
Final Conclusion: The bank account attachment was set aside and the matter was left to be decided afresh by the appellate authority on merits.
Ratio Decidendi: A provisional or recovery attachment cannot continue once there is no pending proceeding supporting it and recovery has been stayed by the competent appellate forum.