Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority had power under Section 128A(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 to enhance the penalty after giving an opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: Section 128A(2) expressly confers on the appellate authority the power to enhance the levy of penalty, subject to notice and opportunity to the affected party. The absence of a departmental appeal does not cut down that statutory power. The analogy drawn with the power of enhancement under the income-tax appellate scheme supports the construction that the appellate authority may enhance the penalty in an assessee's appeal, provided procedural safeguards are observed.
Conclusion: The power of enhancement existed and was validly exercisable. The contrary view was held to be erroneous and the challenge to the enhanced penalty failed.
Final Conclusion: The appellate authority's order enhancing the penalty was sustained in law and the writ appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute expressly authorises the appellate authority to enhance penalty after giving an opportunity of hearing, that power cannot be denied merely because the appeal was not filed by the department.