Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the marble stone articles manufactured and sold by the assessee were handicrafts taxable at the lower rate under Entry 22-A of Part C of the First Schedule, or stone articles taxable at the higher rate under Entry 13 of Part E of the First Schedule.
Analysis: The governing test for handicrafts is whether the article is predominantly made by hand and bears artistic features such as ornamentation or inlay work lending it visual appeal. The Tribunal had treated the goods as stone articles without examining their characteristics. The materials on record, along with the departmental clarification on handmade stone works, sculptures, stone reliefs and stone inlay work, showed that the products were handmade and fell within the concept of handicrafts. Once the goods satisfied the handicraft test, they could not be classified under the general entry for stone articles.
Conclusion: The marble stone articles were handicrafts and were liable to be assessed at 8% under Entry 22-A of Part C of the First Schedule, not at 16% under Entry 13 of Part E of the First Schedule.