TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in an offences case under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The application was considered under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in the context of allegations under Section 132(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court took into account the stage of the case, the filing of the charge-sheet, the period of custody, and the overall facts and circumstances, while expressly refraining from commenting on the merits of the prosecution case.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
