TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, accused of offences under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, was entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The application was considered in the light of the allegations, the stage of investigation, the gravity of the offence, and the rival submissions on behalf of the parties. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court found it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
