Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders were liable to be set aside for want of proper service of notice and denial of a fair opportunity before reassessment.
Analysis: The petitioner had intimated the tax authorities of a change in correspondence address, and the corrected address was reflected in the registration records. The reassessment notice was nevertheless dispatched to the earlier address. In these circumstances, the Court found that the notice was not served on the correct address maintained by the department. Since the statutory notice preceding reassessment was not effectively served, the petitioner was denied a fair opportunity to respond before the assessment orders were passed.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were held vitiated for violation of natural justice and were set aside.