Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the denial of exemption under sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, while processing the return under section 143(1), and the consequent refusal to rectify the intimation under section 154, was sustainable when registration under section 12A had been granted with effect from an earlier date.
Analysis: The assessee trust had been granted registration under section 12A with effect from 16.11.2015, though the order was issued later, and the return had been filed before receipt of that order. The omission to mention the registration in the return was therefore held to be a consequence of the delayed communication of the registration order. In view of the effective registration date, the assessee was entitled to the benefit of section 11, and the exclusion of that benefit in processing under section 143(1) was treated as a mistake apparent from the record. The rectification application was thus held to be maintainable.
Conclusion: The refusal to grant the exemption was not sustainable, the rectification ought to have been allowed, and the assessee was held entitled to the benefits under sections 11, 12 and 13 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: Where registration under section 12A is granted with effect from an earlier date, denial of section 11 benefits solely because the return was filed before receipt of the registration order constitutes a mistake apparent from the record and can be corrected under section 154.