TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether hiring or leasing of buses by APSRTC to the Public Transport Department of the Government of Andhra Pradesh is classifiable as a service by way of giving on hire; (ii) whether the recipient department falls within the meaning of a state transport undertaking for the purpose of Entry 22 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
Issue (i): whether hiring or leasing of buses by APSRTC to the Public Transport Department of the Government of Andhra Pradesh is classifiable as a service by way of giving on hire.
Analysis: The dispute turned on classification of the transaction for GST purposes. The applicable classification guidance required the most specific description to be preferred over a broad description. On that basis, the activity was treated as a service by way of giving on hire rather than as a general leasing arrangement.
Conclusion: The transaction was held to fall within the hiring service description.
Issue (ii): whether the recipient department falls within the meaning of a state transport undertaking for the purpose of Entry 22 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
Analysis: The definition of state transport undertaking was taken from section 2(42) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which includes transport service carried on by the State Government itself. Since the Public Transport Department was operating the public transport service under the control of the State Government, it was treated as satisfying that definition for the exemption entry. The exemption notification was applied on that basis.
Conclusion: The Public Transport Department was held to be covered by the expression state transport undertaking, and the exemption was available.
Final Conclusion: The appellate authority found no reason to disturb the advance ruling and upheld the exemption granted to the transaction.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption entry adopts a statutory definition and the service is specifically described as giving on hire to a state transport undertaking, the statutory definition in the governing transport law controls and the specific service description prevails over a broader characterisation.
TaxTMI 
