TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether receipts from sale of software licences and associated support, maintenance and training services were taxable as royalty in India; (ii) Whether the delay of 57 days in filing the later appeal deserved condonation.
Issue (i): Whether receipts from sale of software licences and associated support, maintenance and training services were taxable as royalty in India.
Analysis: The receipts arose from sale of software licences and related services by a Singapore resident. The controversy was whether such receipts fell within the scope of royalty under the Act and the India-Singapore DTAA. The Tribunal followed the binding ratio in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence Pvt. Ltd. and the coordinate bench decision in the assessee's own case for an earlier year, holding that such receipts were not taxable as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act read with Article 12 of the DTAA.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee; the receipts were held not chargeable to tax as royalty in India.
Issue (ii): Whether the delay of 57 days in filing the later appeal deserved condonation.
Analysis: The assessee filed an affidavit explaining the delay, and the explanation was found to be bona fide and sufficient to prevent timely filing. The delay was therefore accepted as properly explained.
Conclusion: The delay was condoned in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the substantive tax issue in both appeals, and the later appeal was also admitted by condoning the delay.
Ratio Decidendi: Consideration for software licences and associated support services is not taxable as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) when governed by the applicable DTAA, in line with the Supreme Court's ruling on software payments.
TaxTMI 
