Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the certificate issued in Form SVLDRS-3 could be sustained when it did not disclose reasons for refusing to adjust payments stated to have been made by the petitioner under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, and whether the matter required reconsideration after taking such payments into account.
Analysis: The impugned certificate recorded that payments had been made, but it did not state why those amounts were not adjusted while computing the liability under the Scheme. The absence of reasons rendered the certificate cryptic, laconic, non-speaking and unreasoned, showing lack of application of mind. In these circumstances, and without expressing any view on the merits of the parties' rival contentions, the proper course was to set aside the certificate and remit the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law, after bearing in mind the payments said to have been made by the petitioner and after granting an opportunity of personal hearing and submission of documents or objections.
Conclusion: The impugned certificate could not be sustained and the matter was required to be reconsidered afresh after accounting for the petitioner's claimed payments.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent of quashing the impugned certificate and consequential garnishee order, with the dispute sent back for fresh decision after compliance with the Scheme and hearing the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: An order under the Scheme that records payments but gives no reasons for refusing adjustment of those payments is a non-speaking and unreasoned order liable to be set aside and remitted for fresh consideration.