Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Petitioner granted relief: Stay on tax recovery, NOC for advance tax, final disposal on 30.11.2021 The court granted the petitioner's request, quashing the order rejecting the issuance of a 'No Objection Certificate' for advance tax payment exceeding ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petitioner granted relief: Stay on tax recovery, NOC for advance tax, final disposal on 30.11.2021
The court granted the petitioner's request, quashing the order rejecting the issuance of a 'No Objection Certificate' for advance tax payment exceeding the Capital Gain tax amount. The court directed to stay tax recovery for the relevant assessment year and allowed other appropriate relief sought by the petitioner. The court scheduled a final disposal notice for 30.11.2021 and permitted direct service via Speed Post.
Issues: Challenge to rejection of request for issuance of no objection certificate regarding advance tax payment exceeding Capital Gain tax amount.
Analysis: The petitioner challenged the respondent's order rejecting the request for a no objection certificate, despite having paid advance tax exceeding the potential Capital Gain tax amount. The petitioner, a one-fourth owner of a land parcel sold in December 2018, gained Rs. 4.75 crores from the sale. To claim exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act, the amount was deposited with the Bank of India as per the Capital Gains Scheme Accounts, 1988. The return of income for AY 2019-20 showed a deduction claim under section 54F at Rs. 4.65 crores as Nil while computing taxable Capital Gain.
The prayer sought by the petitioner included quashing the impugned order, directing the issuance of a 'No Objection Certificate,' staying tax recovery for AY 2018-19, and providing any other appropriate relief deemed just. The petitioner's advocate highlighted the indemnity bond furnished to the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and argued that the remaining amount with the Department should be allowed since the petitioner no longer intended to claim benefits under the Capital Gain Scheme Accounts. Reference was made to a decision by the Karnataka High Court in Padma Swaminathan vs. Income Tax Officer, supporting the petitioner's stance.
The Court heard the petitioner's advocate and scheduled a final disposal notice for 30.11.2021. Additionally, direct service via Speed Post was permitted alongside the regular mode of service.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
