Works contract classification turns on VAT or sales tax verification, affecting whether construction service demand can survive.

Service classification for contracts involving painting, coating and concrete-related work depends on the true nature of the transaction and whether material was supplied so as to constitute works contract service. Payment of VAT or sales tax on the works contract is a relevant indicator for that classification. Because the records did not conclusively verify tax payment under the works contract head for all contracts, the demand under Commercial and Industrial Construction Service could not be affirmed and the matter required fresh factual verification. If such payment is established, the services are to be treated as works contract service, and no demand under Commercial and Industrial Construction Service can survive, including for the period prior to 01.06.2007.

---

---

Issues: Whether the services rendered by the appellant were classifiable as works contract service rather than Commercial and Industrial Construction Service, and whether the demand could be sustained without verifying payment of VAT or sales tax under the works contract head.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the true nature of the contracts, including painting, coating and concrete-related activities, and on whether the contracts involved supply of material so as to constitute works contract. The relevant departmental clarification indicated that where VAT or sales tax is paid in relation to a works contract, the transaction is indicative of works contract service. The records showed registration under works contract with the sales tax authorities, but the challans did not conclusively establish that VAT or sales tax had been paid under that specific head for all contracts. In the absence of such verification, the classification could not be finally decided and the tax demand under Commercial and Industrial Construction Service could not be affirmed without further factual examination.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for verification of whether VAT or sales tax had been paid under the works contract head. If such payment is established, the services are to be treated as works contract service and no demand under Commercial and Industrial Construction Service can survive, including for the period prior to 01.06.2007.

Final Conclusion: The controversy was not finally concluded on merits and was sent back for fresh factual determination on the applicable service classification.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the contract materials and tax records do not conclusively establish the nature of the transaction, service classification must be determined by verifying whether VAT or sales tax was paid as a works contract, since such payment is a relevant indicator of works contract service.

---