Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act could be sustained against non-signatory independent directors after their resignation, in the absence of specific averments showing that they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the company's business.
Analysis: Liability of a director for an offence by the company is not automatic. For vicarious liability to arise under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the complaint must contain specific averments showing how and in what manner the director was responsible for the conduct of the business of the company. A bald assertion that all directors are liable is insufficient. The resignation material placed on record showed that the petitioners had ceased to be directors before the cheque date, and there was no allegation that they were signatories to the cheque or in charge of the company's day-to-day affairs when the offence was alleged to have occurred.
Conclusion: The proceedings against the petitioners could not be sustained and were liable to be quashed.
Final Conclusion: The complaint did not disclose the ingredients necessary to fasten criminal liability on the petitioners as directors, and continuation of the prosecution would amount to abuse of process.
Ratio Decidendi: Vicarious criminal liability of company directors under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires clear and specific averments showing active responsibility for the company's business at the relevant time; in their absence, proceedings against non-signatory directors are liable to be quashed.