Court emphasizes compliance with G.S.T. Act for seized goods release

The court disposed of the writ petition, emphasizing the petitioner's obligation to comply with the G.S.T. Act's provisions for the release of seized goods. The petitioner's claim of facing starvation due to the seizure was deemed insufficient without fulfilling legal requirements, such as proving ownership and submitting necessary documents. The court directed the petitioner to follow the prescribed procedures under Section 129 of the G.S.T. Act 2017, including submitting the required form for consideration by the authorities. Compliance with statutory requirements and providing specific documentation for ownership were highlighted as essential for the release of seized goods.

---

---

Issues:
Seizure assessment under the relevant G.S.T. Act - Petitioner's contention of starvation due to seizure of goods - Requirement for specific papers to prove ownership and interest in goods for release.

Analysis:

The judgment pertains to a writ petition challenging an order of seizure assessment under the G.S.T. Act issued by respondent no. 3. The order impugned was passed concerning the seizure of a three-wheeler carrying betel nuts without proper documentation during transportation. The weight of the goods was found to be 520 Kg, and the vehicle was 930 Kg, leading to the seizure under relevant provisions of the G.S.T. Act 2017.

The petitioner, representing himself, raised concerns about facing starvation due to the seizure of the betel nuts by the authorities. However, the court noted that the petitioner must comply with the provisions of the G.S.T. Act to secure the release of the seized goods. Respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3 argued that the petitioner cannot solely claim release based on starvation and must follow the prescribed procedures outlined in Section 129 of the G.S.T. Act 2017, including submitting FORM GST MOV-08 for the release of the goods.

Upon reviewing the grounds presented in the petition, the court emphasized the petitioner's duty to provide specific papers demonstrating ownership and interest in the goods. Merely claiming starvation without fulfilling the legal requirements for release, such as paying due taxes or demonstrating ownership, would not suffice. The court directed the petitioner to approach respondent no. 3 with a formal application under Clause (C) of Section 129 of the G.S.T. Act 2017 for due consideration and decision in accordance with the law.

In conclusion, the writ petition was disposed of with the court's observation that the petitioner must adhere to the legal provisions and procedures outlined in the G.S.T. Act for the release of the seized goods. The judgment underscores the importance of compliance with statutory requirements and the necessity of providing specific documentation to establish ownership and entitlement to the goods in question.

---