Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the facts and circumstances, it was a fit case for waiver of the minimum pre-deposit of 20% of the compensation awarded by the trial court in an appeal against conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Analysis: Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as amended, makes pre-deposit the general rule in an appeal by the drawer against conviction under Section 138, and waiver is permissible only in exceptional cases on the basis of special reasons. The Court declined to re-appreciate the merits of the conviction at the stage of considering waiver and noted that the trial court had recorded findings based on documentary evidence and admissions regarding business dealings, signatures on relevant documents, and the liability claimed. The objections based on alleged excess cheque amount, alleged security cheque, financial difficulty, resignation from the firm, and non-fulfilment of Section 141 were held to be matters for the appeal and did not justify exemption from the statutory pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was not warranted, and the petitioners were not entitled to exemption from the statutory minimum deposit.