TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjustment made while processing the return under section 143(1) towards employees' contribution to provident fund and ESI was sustainable, and whether such contribution, paid after the due date under the respective welfare laws but before the due date for filing the return, could be disallowed.
Analysis: The return had been processed only under section 143(1), without scrutiny assessment. The dispute concerned a claim that required examination and was therefore not a matter for a prima facie adjustment. The reasoning proceeded on the basis that employees' contribution to provident fund and ESI, if deposited before the due date for filing the return, is allowable, and that conflicting views on the point support adoption of the construction favourable to the assessee. The Tribunal followed its earlier view that such an issue is outside the limited scope of section 143(1) adjustments and also treated the deduction as allowable on merits where payment was made before the return-filing due date.
Conclusion: The adjustment under section 143(1) was unsustainable and the disallowance was deleted. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A debatable claim relating to employees' contribution to welfare funds cannot be finally disallowed as a prima facie adjustment under section 143(1), and such contribution is allowable when paid before the due date for filing the return.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
