Charitable exemption survives incidental income where printing and publishing are not carried on as trade, commerce, or business.

A charitable institution running a printing press and publishing a newspaper does not lose exemption under section 11 merely because it earns income from those activities. The first proviso to section 2(15) applies only where the activities amount to trade, commerce or business; mere receipt of fees or generation of income is not enough absent a profit motive or intent to distribute profits. Where the income is applied to charitable objects and the concurrent findings of the lower authorities support charitable character, exemption remains available and those findings will not be disturbed absent perversity.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee's activities of running a printing press and publishing a newspaper brought it within the first proviso to section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 so as to deny exemption under section 11.

Analysis: The assessee was found to be a charitable institution and the income generated from its activities was applied for charitable purposes. The activities were not shown to be carried on with a profit motive or with an intent to distribute profits. Mere receipt of fees or generation of income did not, by itself, establish that the assessee was carrying on trade, commerce or business. The Court also found support in the existing registrations and exemptions already granted to the assessee, and held that there was no perversity in the concurrent findings of the lower authorities.

Conclusion: The first proviso to section 2(15) was not attracted, and the assessee remained entitled to exemption under section 11.

Ratio Decidendi: A charitable institution does not lose exemption merely because it earns income from incidental activities, if those activities are not driven by a profit motive and the income is applied to charitable objects; concurrent factual findings on this question will not be disturbed absent perversity.

---