Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The operational creditor's invoices related to November 2013 to February 2014, and the claimed due date was in March 2014. Under the Limitation Act, 1963, Article 137 applies to applications under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, giving a three-year period from the date when the right to apply accrues. The petition was filed in January 2020, well after expiry of the limitation period, and no application for condonation of delay was filed. On these facts, the debt and default could not be acted upon for initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process.
Conclusion: The petition was barred by limitation and could not be entertained.
Final Conclusion: The insolvency application was rejected at the threshold without examination on merits, as the claim was time-barred.
Ratio Decidendi: An application for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by an operational creditor must be filed within the limitation period computed from the date of default, and a time-barred petition without condonation is liable to be dismissed.