Merits-based exoneration in SEBI adjudication can justify staying criminal prosecution on identical allegations pending appeal.

Criminal prosecution under the SEBI Act may be stayed where the same allegations were rejected on merits in adjudication proceedings and that exoneration is under challenge before the Supreme Court. The governing principle noted is that adjudication and criminal proceedings can ordinarily proceed together, but a merits-based finding that the violations are unsustainable can justify suspension of prosecution on identical facts. Here, the earlier adjudication order exonerating the applicants was not based on a technical ground, and the criminal complaint was kept in abeyance until the Supreme Court decides the pending appeal against that order.

---

---

Issues: Whether criminal prosecution under the SEBI Act could be stayed where the applicants had been exonerated on merits in adjudication proceedings arising from the same allegations, and the adjudication order was under challenge before the Supreme Court.

Analysis: The adjudication findings were relied upon to contend that the prosecution for identical violations could not continue. The governing principle applied was that simultaneous adjudication and criminal proceedings may proceed, but where exoneration in adjudication is on merits and the allegations are found unsustainable, criminal prosecution on the same facts cannot ordinarily continue. The earlier exoneration in favour of the applicants was noted to be on merits, not on a technical ground, while the appellate challenge to that adjudication outcome remained pending before the Supreme Court.

Conclusion: The criminal complaint was ordered to remain stayed until the Supreme Court decided the pending civil appeal against the adjudication order.

Final Conclusion: The prosecution was not terminated, but its continuation was suspended pending the outcome of the Supreme Court proceedings on the underlying adjudication decision.

Ratio Decidendi: Where exoneration in adjudication proceedings is on merits and the same finding is under appellate scrutiny, criminal prosecution on identical allegations may be stayed pending final determination of the adjudication appeal.

---