Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The appellant challenged the assessments for the years 2003-04 to 2005-06, arguing that the assessments were time-barred. The assessments were completed under section 153A read with section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, following a search operation under section 132 of the Act. The appellant contended that the extended time limit for completing the assessments was unwarranted as the reference for special audit under section 142(2A) was not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal noted that the appellant's case was similar to the case of M/s. Sunder Mal Satpal, where the ITAT had previously held that the reference for special audit was not justified and the assessments were time-barred.
Issue 2: Validity of the Reference for Special Audit Under Section 142(2A)The appellant argued that the special audit reference was invalid as it did not meet the requirements of section 142(2A). The Tribunal examined the reasons for the special audit, which included translating books from Mahajani to English, bifurcating transactions, and reconciling accounts. These reasons were identical to those in the case of M/s. Sunder Mal Satpal, where the ITAT had found no complexity in the accounts that would justify a special audit. The Tribunal also addressed the jurisdictional issue raised by the Revenue, noting that the ITAT had the authority to adjudicate the validity of the special audit reference when determining if the assessment was time-barred. The Tribunal cited various decisions, including those of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court, supporting its jurisdiction to consider such issues.
Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the reference for special audit under section 142(2A) was invalid as it did not meet the statutory requirements. Consequently, the assessments made in the extended time period were held to be time-barred. The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant, and the assessments were quashed.
Order:All the captioned appeals of the assessee were allowed. The order was pronounced on 4th October, 2021.