Court dismisses Writ petition for Writ of Mandamus over SABKA VISHWAS SCHEME 2019; petitioner must challenge rejection order first. The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct consideration of repayment under the 'SABKA VISWAHS SCHEME 2019' as the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court dismisses Writ petition for Writ of Mandamus over SABKA VISHWAS SCHEME 2019; petitioner must challenge rejection order first.
The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct consideration of repayment under the "SABKA VISWAHS SCHEME 2019" as the petitioner did not challenge the rejection order before filing the petition. The Court stated that the petition could not be entertained without challenging the rejection order first. The dismissal of the petition did not bar the petitioner from challenging the rejection order through proper legal channels in the future. The Court dismissed the writ petition without costs and closed the related application.
Issues: 1. Petition for Writ of Mandamus to direct consideration of representation for repayment under "SABKA VISWAHS SCHEME 2019".
Analysis: The petitioner filed a Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 23.10.2020 for the repayment of Rs. 40,176 under the "SABKA VISWAHS SCHEME 2019". The petitioner had paid this amount online but it was returned to their account by the bank. The petitioner requested reconsideration of the issue and permission to avail the scheme. However, the respondents rejected the representation through an order dated 10.03.2021. The Court noted that since the petitioner did not challenge the rejection order before moving the writ petition, the Court could not entertain the petition.
Conclusion: The Court found that since the petitioner did not challenge the rejection order dated 10.03.2021 before filing the writ petition seeking Mandamus, the petition could not be entertained. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed. However, the dismissal of the petition did not prevent the petitioner from challenging the rejection order through appropriate legal means if advised to do so. The Court dismissed the writ petition with no costs and closed the connected application.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.