Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the product 'Nimbooz' was classifiable under Tariff Item 2202 10 20 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or under Tariff Item 2202 90 20 as a fruit pulp or fruit juice based drink.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the tariff classification of the product. A Larger Bench decision on the same product and similar variants had already answered the classification issue and held that 'Nimbooz' falls under Tariff Item 2202 90 20 in the category of fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks. Following that binding determination, the Tribunal accepted the classification position as settled for the product under consideration. Once the classification issue was resolved in that manner, the demand confirmed on the contrary classification could not survive.
Conclusion: 'Nimbooz' was held classifiable under Tariff Item 2202 90 20 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and not under Tariff Item 2202 10 20.