Tribunal remits issues for reevaluation, directs fair opportunity for Assessee, notes non-compliance.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting various issues back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the decision-making process regarding additions made on account of Sundry Creditors, Interest Income, and failure to appreciate evidence, directing the AO to provide the Assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case. The Tribunal noted non-compliance with notice requirements under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act but dismissed certain grounds due to lack of arguments.

---

---

Issues:
1. Validity of assessment order passed under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act without serving notice to the Assessee Company.
2. Opportunity of being heard not provided to the Assessee during assessment proceedings.
3. Addition of income on account of Sundry Creditors and Interest Income.
4. Failure to appreciate evidence of transaction w.r.t. Sundry Trade Creditors.
5. Upholding addition of Interest Income received from M/s. Intec Securities.
6. Alleged failure to consider explanation and evidence by CIT(A).

Issue 1 - Validity of Assessment Order:
The Appellant contested the assessment order passed under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, alleging non-compliance with the requirement of serving notice to the Assessee Company. The Tribunal noted that the AO proceeded with the assessment under section 144 due to non-appearance of the assessee, resulting from information received through the Non-filers Monitoring System. The Tribunal dismissed Grounds 1, 2, and 4 as they were not pressed during arguments.

Issue 2 - Opportunity of Being Heard:
The Appellant argued that no opportunity of being heard was provided during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal observed that the AO made additions based on incomplete details of sundry creditors and interest income. The CIT(A) upheld these additions. However, the Tribunal found that the Appellant had supplied complete details during the first appellate proceedings. Due to inadequate scrutiny, the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the AO to decide afresh after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

Issue 3 - Addition of Income:
The AO made additions on account of Sundry Creditors and Interest Income, which were upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found discrepancies in the decision-making process and remitted both issues back to the AO for reevaluation after providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case.

Issue 4 - Failure to Appreciate Evidence:
The Appellant claimed that the CIT(A) failed to appreciate the evidence regarding transactions w.r.t. Sundry Trade Creditors. The Tribunal acknowledged the submissions made by the Appellant and remitted the issue back to the AO for a fresh decision.

Issue 5 - Upholding Addition of Interest Income:
The AO added Interest Income received from M/s. Intec Securities, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found discrepancies in the decision-making process and remitted the issue back to the AO for reevaluation after providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case.

Issue 6 - Alleged Failure to Consider Explanation:
The Appellant alleged that the CIT(A) failed to consider the explanation and evidence presented. The Tribunal did not provide a detailed analysis of this issue as it was considered general in nature and did not require adjudication.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting several issues back to the AO for reevaluation after ensuring the assessee is provided with a fair opportunity to present their case.

---