Extension granted for Rs. 12.78 Crores balance payment in insolvency case due to COVID-19 impact. The Tribunal granted an extension of three months for the balance payment of Rs. 12.78 Crores under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Extension granted for Rs. 12.78 Crores balance payment in insolvency case due to COVID-19 impact.
The Tribunal granted an extension of three months for the balance payment of Rs. 12.78 Crores under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to delays caused by the Resolution Professional's inaction and the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on financial activities. The extension was approved following negotiations between the parties, with the Committee of Creditors approving the extension and the Resolution Applicant agreeing to pay an additional amount. The Tribunal emphasized the need for cooperation among stakeholders in insolvency proceedings and considered external factors affecting financial activities.
Issues: 1. Extension of time for balance payment under the IBC, 2016.
Detailed Analysis: 1. The case involved an application filed by Bhadrashree Steel and Power Limited seeking an extension of 120 days for the balance payment of Rs. 12.78 Crores under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The applicant requested the Resolution Professional to complete formalities and hand over management of the Corporate Debtor to the Resolution Applicant. The delay in implementation was attributed to the inaction of the RP despite repeated requests by the Applicant and the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on financial activities.
2. The Resolution Professional (RP) did not object to granting time for the balance payment and implementation of the Resolution Plan within 120 days from the approval order. The RP's inaction in discharging duties, obtaining necessary approvals, and failure to hand over management control affected the plan's implementation adversely. Discussions in the Monitoring Committee led to the Resolution Applicant filing an application seeking an extension of time for payment as per the approved Resolution Plan.
3. The Tribunal considered the negotiations between the parties, where the CoC (sole financial creditor) approved the extension, and the Resolution Applicant agreed to pay an additional amount. Consequently, an extension of three months was granted for making the balance payment of Rs. 12.78 Crores. The Tribunal disposed of the application by allowing the extension and did not order any costs to be paid.
This judgment addressed the issue of granting an extension of time for balance payment under the IBC, 2016, considering the circumstances, negotiations between the parties, and the RP's role in the plan's implementation. The Tribunal's decision to grant a three-month extension highlighted the importance of cooperation between stakeholders in insolvency proceedings and the impact of external factors like the COVID-19 pandemic on financial activities.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.