Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether double hole perforators manufactured by the assessee were liable to duty as punching machines under Tariff Item 33D of the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The relevant test was whether the goods in question fell within the meaning of punching machines under Tariff Item 33D. The decision noted that single hole perforators had already been treated as outside that tariff item. On the same basis, double hole perforators were considered to stand on the same footing and not to be covered by the tariff entry.
Conclusion: The goods did not fall within Tariff Item 33D and were not dutiable under that item.