Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dumper body manufactured by the petitioners was to be treated as part of the motor vehicle under Item 34 of the Central Excise Tariff, and consequently included in the assessable value.
Analysis: The dumper was held to be a type of truck with a dump body arranged to tilt and discharge material. It was not mounted on earth-moving or material-handling equipment and was not a specialised material-handling appliance. The body was, therefore, regarded as part of the dumper itself. The view taken by the Appellate Collector was accepted, and the contention that such body should be excluded from duty treatment was not accepted. The authority also noted that where trucks are cleared after the body is fitted, the assessable value includes the body portion.
Conclusion: The dumper body was held to be part of the motor vehicle and includible in the assessable value, against the petitioners.