Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether outboard motors imported for marine use are covered by the expression "marine engines" for the purpose of exemption Notification No. 281-Customs of 1976.
Analysis: The goods were accepted as engines under Heading 84.06 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the interpretative note on composite machines required classification according to the component performing the principal function. The principal function of an outboard motor is propulsion of a water-borne vessel, and its size, fuel type, stroke pattern, or detachable character did not justify excluding it from the broader category of marine engines. The same meaning was held to govern both tariff classification and the exemption notification, reinforced by Section 20 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
Conclusion: Outboard motors were held to be marine engines for the purpose of Notification No. 281-Customs of 1976, and the exemption was directed to be granted.
Final Conclusion: The revision application succeeded and consequential relief followed from the acceptance of outboard motors within the exempted category of marine engines.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a composite marine propulsion unit performs the principal function of an engine, it must be classified and treated consistently as a marine engine for both tariff and exemption purposes.