TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the National Disaster Management Authority was bound under Section 12 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 to recommend guidelines for ex gratia assistance on account of loss of life due to Covid-19; (ii) whether the Court could direct payment of a fixed ex gratia amount of Rs. 4 lakhs to the affected families; (iii) whether simplified guidelines were required for issuance of death certificates or official documents recording death due to Covid-19 and whether the Union of India should consider social security measures recommended by the Finance Commission.
Issue (i): Whether the National Disaster Management Authority was bound under Section 12 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 to recommend guidelines for ex gratia assistance on account of loss of life due to Covid-19.
Analysis: Section 12 uses the word "shall" twice and is framed in mandatory terms. The provision requires the National Authority to recommend minimum standards of relief, and ex gratia assistance on account of loss of life forms part of those minimum standards. Covid-19 had already been treated as a notified disaster and, in any event, falls within the statutory definition of disaster. A construction treating the provision as merely directory would defeat the object of the Act.
Conclusion: The National Authority was under a mandatory statutory duty to recommend guidelines covering ex gratia assistance for deaths caused by Covid-19.
Issue (ii): Whether the Court could direct payment of a fixed ex gratia amount of Rs. 4 lakhs to the affected families.
Analysis: Fixing the quantum of ex gratia assistance involves policy choices, priorities, allocation of scarce public resources, and balancing of competing relief measures under the disaster management framework. In matters of economic and fiscal policy, judicial review is limited and the Court will not substitute its own view for that of the competent authority unless the policy is arbitrary or unlawful. The amount must be determined by the National Authority and the Union Government while considering the available funds and other competing needs.
Conclusion: No direction was issued to pay a fixed amount of Rs. 4 lakhs, and the quantum was left to the competent authority.
Issue (iii): Whether simplified guidelines were required for issuance of death certificates or official documents recording death due to Covid-19 and whether the Union of India should consider social security measures recommended by the Finance Commission.
Analysis: Accurate recording of cause of death is necessary so that families can access lawful benefits and the public record reflects the true impact of the pandemic. The existing procedure was found capable of simplification, and the competent authority was directed to issue clear guidelines for certificates stating death due to Covid-19, with a remedy for correction where necessary. The Court also noted the Finance Commission's recommendations on insurance and social protection and required the Union of India to consider them in consultation with stakeholders.
Conclusion: Simplified guidelines for death certification were directed, and the Union of India was required to take appropriate steps on the Finance Commission's recommendations.
Final Conclusion: The petitions succeeded only to the extent of enforcing the statutory duty to frame ex gratia guidelines and to simplify death certification procedures, while the Court declined to fix the compensation amount itself.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute mandatorily requires the competent authority to frame minimum-relief guidelines including ex gratia assistance, the duty can be enforced by mandamus, but the Court will not itself determine the quantum of relief when that choice depends on policy, priorities, and resource allocation.
TaxTMI 
