Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Government was bound by its earlier export quota policy so as to be precluded, on principles of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation, from introducing a revised export policy withdrawing MEE and NQE quotas.
Analysis: The change in the export policy was traced to altered international trade conditions and obligations arising from the GATT/ATC framework, along with the need to improve competitiveness, curb misuse of the earlier quota system, and protect export potential and foreign exchange earnings. In matters of economic and fiscal policy, the executive has wide discretion to revise, withdraw, or replace an earlier policy in public interest. The doctrine of promissory estoppel cannot be invoked to prevent a policy change made in public interest, and legitimate expectation does not fetter the authority where the decision is within the lawful range of executive choice and is neither mala fide nor an abuse of power. An applicant for export benefits acquires no vested right to insist on the continuance of a previous scheme.
Conclusion: The Government was not barred by promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation from revising the export policy and withdrawing the MEE and NQE quota system.
Final Conclusion: The revised export policy was upheld, and the challenge to the notification failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A prior export or import policy does not create a vested right in its continuance, and the Government may alter such policy in public interest unless the change is shown to be mala fide or an abuse of power.