Commercial quantity under NDPS bars bail where recovery, linked documents, and statements support complicity and conspiracy.

Bail was declined in an NDPS prosecution involving recovery of commercial quantity, as the material on record did not justify release under Section 439 CrPC. The Court relied on the recovered contraband, the baggage and documents linked to the petitioner, and statements indicating complicity and conspiracy, and noted that charges had already been framed and were not challenged. In these circumstances, the statutory restriction applicable to commercial quantity under the NDPS Act operated against bail, and the court found no ground to ignore the prosecution material at the bail stage.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in a prosecution under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 involving recovery of commercial quantity, and whether the rigours of the statutory bail restriction were satisfied.

Analysis: The petition was for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in a case involving recovery of 2.7 kg of charas, which was treated as commercial quantity. Charges had already been framed and were not challenged. The record referred to the recovered contraband, the baggage and documents linked to the petitioner, and the statements of the accused reflecting complicity and conspiracy. In such circumstances, the Court held that the material on record could not be ignored at the bail stage and that the statutory restriction applicable to commercial quantity under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 operated against release on bail.

Conclusion: Bail was declined, as no ground for release was found in view of the commercial quantity recovery and the bar applicable under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

---