Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand notice could be sustained when it arose from the retrospective operation of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax (5th Amendment) Act, 2013 in the light of the Government notification dated 21.04.2015.
Analysis: The demand was founded on the retrospective operation of the statutory amendment. The Court noted that a similar issue had already been considered by a Division Bench and that, in view of the Government notification dated 21.04.2015, the retrospective demands stood waived. On that basis, the impugned demand was found to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The demand notice was quashed and the writ petition was allowed in favour of the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: A demand arising solely from the retrospective operation of an amendment cannot survive where the competent Government notification has waived the retrospective demands.