Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revenue's appeal was maintainable in view of the monetary limit prescribed for departmental appeals, and whether any exception to that limit applied.
Analysis: The appeal arose from a demand and penalty under the Central Excise Act, but the tax effect was only Rs. 3,45,203/-. The applicable circular prescribed a much higher monetary threshold for filing departmental appeals. No issue concerning constitutional validity was involved, and no notification, instruction, order, or circular had been held illegal or ultra vires so as to attract any exception to the monetary limit.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed on the ground of low tax effect, which is in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A departmental appeal below the prescribed monetary threshold is not maintainable unless it falls within a recognised exception expressly carved out in the governing circular.