Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Stay of demand granted until appeal disposal for A.Y. 2015-16, citing Section 254(2A) compliance. The Tribunal granted a stay of demand for six months or until the disposal of the appeal for A.Y. 2015-16, whichever is earlier, considering compliance ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Stay of demand granted until appeal disposal for A.Y. 2015-16, citing Section 254(2A) compliance.
The Tribunal granted a stay of demand for six months or until the disposal of the appeal for A.Y. 2015-16, whichever is earlier, considering compliance with Section 254(2A), pending appeal for A.Y. 2014-15, and similarity in transfer pricing adjustments between the two years. The stay petition of the assessee was allowed under these terms.
Issues: Stay application for demand raised for A.Y. 2015-16
Analysis: 1. Payment of Demand: The assessee had paid a significant portion of the demand raised, amounting to Rs. 114.86 Crores out of Rs. 292.92 Crores, which was confirmed by the AO. This constituted 39.21% of the demand.
2. Extension of Stay: The current application sought an extension of the stay previously granted by the Tribunal. The Tribunal had granted successive extensions up to 31/01/2021, as per orders from the Bombay High Court. The AO rejected the extension application, citing that the assessee had lost before the first appellate authority and the appeal was pending only before the Tribunal.
3. Comparison with A.Y. 2014-15: In a similar situation for A.Y. 2014-15, the AO had granted a stay of demand considering pending matters before the Tribunal. For A.Y. 2015-16, the AO initially granted a stay but later vacated it. The demand arose due to transfer pricing adjustments, similar to those in the A.Y. 2014-15 appeal awaiting Tribunal's order.
4. Legal Provisions: The Tribunal considered Section 254(2A) of the Act, which requires payment of 20% of the demand for granting stay. Although this provision may not directly apply to an extension of stay, the Tribunal relied on it due to the compliance made by the assessee. The Tribunal also factored in the pending appeal for A.Y. 2014-15 and the similarity of issues between the two assessment years.
5. Decision: Considering the compliance with Section 254(2A), the pending appeal for A.Y. 2014-15, and the similarity in TP adjustments between the two years, the Tribunal granted a stay of demand for six months or until the disposal of the appeal for A.Y. 2015-16, whichever is earlier. The stay petition of the assessee was allowed under these terms.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
of 
TaxTMI 
