Tribunal upholds deletion of penalty for inaccurate income details in tax assessment

The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year in question. The Department's appeal against the deletion of the penalty imposed on the assessee for capitalizing expenditure on Bus Queue Shelters was dismissed, as it was deemed that the treatment of trade income/expenditure did not constitute inaccurate particulars or income concealment. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the Commissioner's decision, emphasizing the disclosure of all relevant details to the Assessing Officer.

---

---

Issues:
Deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the Department against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-36, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2012-13, challenging the deletion of a penalty of Rs. 87,94,892 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, engaged in 'out-of-home' advertisement, had capitalized expenditure on Bus Queue Shelters (BQS) but claimed it as revenue expenditure in the return of income. The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenditure as capital expenditure, leading to penalty imposition under section 271(1)(c). However, the penalty was deleted by the Ld. CIT(A) for Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09, and the Department's appeals against these deletions were dismissed by the ITAT in 2020.

In the present case, the Tribunal noted that the facts in Assessment Years 2007-08 and 2008-09 were identical to the current year under appeal. The Ld. Sr. Departmental Representative accepted this fact, leading to the upholding of the Ld. CIT(A)'s order and the dismissal of the Department's appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that changing the treatment of trade income/expenditure from capital to revenue does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealing income, especially when all details were disclosed to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the CIT(A)'s decision, as there was a difference of opinion regarding the nature of the expenditure on BQS.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Department's appeal, affirming the decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year in question. The decision was announced at the Virtual Hearing on 12th July 2021.

---