Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court confirms Customs decision on 'Hand Mixer' goods, directs statutory appeal process</h1> <h3>M/s. KELHOMEIMPEX Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS</h3> M/s. KELHOMEIMPEX Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS - TMI Issues:1. Confiscation of goods imported under the title 'Hand Mixer' objected by Customs.2. Imposition of penalty under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962.3. Dismissal of writ petition due to alternate remedy of appeal under section 129A(1) of the Act.Confiscation of Goods:The appellant imported goods under the title 'Hand Mixer,' but Customs claimed they were 'Hand Held Blenders.' The Commissioner of Customs directed confiscation of the goods and allowed redemption on payment of a fine under section 125 of the Customs Act. A penalty was also imposed under section 112(a) of the Act.Imposition of Penalty:The appellant challenged the Commissioner's order through a writ petition. The single Judge dismissed the petition citing the availability of an alternate remedy of appeal under section 129A(1) of the Act. The High Court, after hearing arguments, found no grounds to interfere with the judgment, stating that the appellant had been directed to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal, causing no prejudice. The Court declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226.Dismissal of Writ Petition:The appellant's concern regarding the Appellate Tribunal's functioning post-lockdown was addressed by the Standing Counsel, confirming the Tribunal had resumed hearings. The Court directed the appellant to file an appeal before the Tribunal within a week. If an appeal is lodged, the Tribunal was instructed to expedite the proceedings after hearing all concerned parties. The writ appeal was dismissed with these instructions.