Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment and the appellate dismissal deserved interference where notice was stated to have been issued only to some of the legal heirs and the appeal had been rejected as time-barred without examining the merits.
Analysis: The appeal was dismissed by the first appellate authority on limitation without condoning the delay or dealing with the merits. The record showed that the deceased assessee had several legal heirs, whereas the reassessment notice was not issued to all of them. In such circumstances, the matter required consideration on merits and the legal heirs had to be given a proper opportunity before a fresh decision could be taken. The proper course was therefore to restore the matter to the assessing authority for de novo consideration after issuing notice to all legal heirs and granting them a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Conclusion: The matter was restored to the assessing authority for fresh adjudication after notice to all legal heirs, and the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.