Rectification Application Rejection Upheld for Late Form Filing

The tribunal upheld the rejection of the rectification application under Section 154, stating that the appellant's failure to file Form 10 manually before the due date rendered the adjustment by CPC not rectifiable. The tribunal also dismissed the appellant's argument regarding the set-off of accumulated deficit against current year's income, as this issue was not raised in the rectification application and could not be challenged under Section 154 proceedings.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Maintainability of rectification application under Section 154.
2. Consideration of CBDT Circulars for condonation of delay in filing Form 10.
3. Set-off of accumulated deficit against current year’s income.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Maintainability of Rectification Application under Section 154:
The appellant trust challenged the decision of CIT(A) in holding that a rectification application under Section 154 was not maintainable against the order under Section 143(1) issued by CPC Bengaluru. The appellant argued that the adjustment made by CPC was based on the non-filing of Form 10 electronically, which was not mandated for AY 2015-16. The return of income and Tax Audit Report in Form 10B, both filed before the due date, indicated the set-apart amount. The appellant contended that the adjustment was erroneous and fell within the purview of a mistake apparent from the record, eligible for rectification under Section 154. The tribunal noted that the scope of Section 143(1) is restricted to prima facie mistakes and that the CPC could not have made the adjustment without considering the manual filing of Form 10. However, the tribunal ultimately upheld the rejection of the rectification application, stating that the appellant failed to file Form 10 manually before the due date, and thus, the adjustment by CPC was not rectifiable under Section 154.

2. Consideration of CBDT Circulars for Condonation of Delay in Filing Form 10:
The appellant argued that CIT(A) ignored CBDT Circular No. 7/2018 and Circular No. 10/2019, which allowed for condonation of delays in filing Form 10 for assessment years preceding AY 2018-19. The appellant submitted that these circulars were brought to CIT(A)'s attention, but CIT(A) did not consider them. The tribunal observed that the circulars allowed the Commissioner to condone delays in filing Form 10 electronically but did not exempt the appellant from filing Form 10 manually within the stipulated time. Since the appellant did not file Form 10 manually before the due date, the tribunal held that the appellant could not benefit from the CBDT Circulars in the context of a rectification application under Section 154.

3. Set-off of Accumulated Deficit against Current Year’s Income:
The appellant raised an additional ground before CIT(A), arguing that the trust had accumulated excess expenditure over receipts, amounting to over Rs. 55.29 crores, which should have been considered while processing the return. The appellant contended that the CPC could have allowed the set-off against the accumulated deficit. The tribunal noted that this issue was not raised in the rectification application before the AO and was not emanating from the order under Section 154. The tribunal held that the appellant could not use Section 154 proceedings to challenge the order under Section 143(1) and rejected this ground.

Conclusion:
The tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the rectification application under Section 154, stating that the appellant failed to file Form 10 manually before the due date and could not benefit from CBDT Circulars in this context. The tribunal also rejected the additional ground for set-off of accumulated deficit, as it was not part of the rectification application.

---